From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction |
Date: | 2020-03-12 12:12:06 |
Message-ID: | 20200312121206.GC29065@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 04:30:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, another thing I noticed while looking around is that some of
> the functions using SRF_RETURN_DONE() think they should clean up
> memory beforehand. This is a waste of code/cycles, as long as the
> memory was properly allocated in funcctx->multi_call_memory_ctx,
> because funcapi.c takes care of deleting that context.
>
> We should probably document that *any* manual cleanup before
> SRF_RETURN_DONE() is an antipattern. If you have to have cleanup,
> it needs to be done via RegisterExprContextCallback instead.
This part appears to be already in place since
e4186762ffaa4188e16702e8f4f299ea70988b96:
|The memory context that is current when the SRF is called is a transient
|context that will be cleared between calls. This means that you do not need to
|call pfree on everything you allocated using palloc; it will go away anyway.
|However, if you want to allocate any data structures to live across calls, you
|need to put them somewhere else. The memory context referenced by
|multi_call_memory_ctx is a suitable location for any data that needs to survive
|until the SRF is finished running. In most cases, this means that you should
|switch into multi_call_memory_ctx while doing the first-call setup.
--
Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Prabhat Sahu | 2020-03-12 12:22:20 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-03-12 12:11:56 | Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction |