From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |
Date: | 2020-03-09 10:31:42 |
Message-ID: | 20200309103142.GA45401@nol |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 01:26:19PM -0700, legrand legrand wrote:
> Please consider PG13 shortest path ;o)
>
> My one is parse->queryId != UINT64CONST(0) in pgss_planner_hook().
> It fixes IVM problem (verified),
> and keep CTAS equal to pgss without planning counters (verified too).
I still disagree that hiding this problem is the right fix, but since no one
objected here's a v5 with that behavior. Hopefully this will be fixed in v14.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-Pass-query-string-to-the-planner.patch | text/plain | 10.4 KB |
v5-0002-Add-planning-counters-to-pg_stat_statements.patch | text/plain | 45.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2020-03-09 11:13:47 | Re: Run-time pruning for ModifyTable |
Previous Message | Kuntal Ghosh | 2020-03-09 10:08:29 | Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line |