| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hamid Akhtar <hamid(dot)akhtar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server? |
| Date: | 2020-03-06 01:24:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20200306012404.GA10548@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 05:42:11PM +0500, Hamid Akhtar wrote:
> Here is the v2 of the same patch after rebasing it and running it through
> pgindent. There are no other code changes.
The paragraph about max_age_prepared_xacts doesn't define what is the
effect of treating a transaction as orphaned.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-03-06 01:29:46 | Re: Crash by targetted recovery |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-03-06 01:21:20 | Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line |