Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ivan Kartyshov <i(dot)kartyshov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Date: 2020-03-05 06:38:33
Message-ID: 20200305063833.GV2593@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 07:17:31AM -0500, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/4/20 5:36 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> There are no updates from about two years before, but this patch
>> has been registered in CF 2020-03. Not sure why. It should be marked
>> as Returned with Feedback again?
>
> Worse, it was marked Needs Review even though no new patch was provided.
>
> I'm going to set this back to Returned with Feedback. If anyone has a good
> reason that it should be in the CF we can always revive it.

+1.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-03-05 06:40:36 Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-05 06:35:48 Re: WAL usage calculation patch