From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Crash by targetted recovery |
Date: | 2020-03-05 03:08:41 |
Message-ID: | 20200305.120841.2172224092865554026.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Mon, 2 Mar 2020 20:54:04 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
> > And random access during StandbyMode ususally (always?) lets RecPtr go
> > back. I'm not sure WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable works correctly if we
> > don't have a file in pg_wal and the REDO point is far back by more
> > than a segment from the initial checkpoint record.
>
> It works correctly. This is why WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable() uses
> fetching_ckpt argument.
Hmm. You're right. We start streaming from RedoStartLSN when
fetching_ckpt. So that doesn't happen.
> > If we go back to XLOG_FROM_ARCHIVE by random access, it correctly
> > re-connects to the primary for the past segment.
>
> But this can lead to unnecessary restart of walreceiver. Since
> fetching_ckpt ensures that the WAL file containing the REDO
> starting record exists in pg_wal, there is no need to reconnect
> to the primary when reading the REDO starting record.
>
> Is there other case where we need to go back to XLOG_FROM_ARCHIVE
> by random access?
I understand that the reconnection for REDO record is useless. Ok I
take the !StandbyMode way.
The attached is the test script that is changed to count the added
test, and the slight revised main patch.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-TAP-test-for-a-crash-bug.patch | text/x-patch | 2.3 KB |
v3-0002-Fix-a-crash-bug-of-targetted-promotion.patch | text/x-patch | 1.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-03-05 03:17:24 | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-03-05 02:34:14 | Re: PATCH: add support for IN and @> in functional-dependency statistics use |