Re: Psql patch to show access methods info

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Psql patch to show access methods info
Date: 2020-03-04 02:59:00
Message-ID: 20200304025900.GA7361@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Mar-04, Alexander Korotkov wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:33 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I think I would like this feature to be in, but I'm not sure that the
> > shape is final yet. My points:
> >
> > a) I don't see any use for \dA as presented; I think the \dA+ output is
> > useful. Therefore my preference would be that \dA presents what the
> > latest patch has as \dA+. I think we should leave \dA+ unimplemented
> > for now; maybe we can use some use for it later on.
>
> Neither \dA or \dA+ are introduced or affected by this patch. If we
> like to change their behavior, we should probably do this separately
> from this patch.

Doh, you're right, sorry.

Looking only at the regress/expected/psql.out changes, I'm satisfied
with this version of the patch.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2020-03-04 03:03:59 Re: Fastpath while arranging the changes in LSN order in logical decoding
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-04 02:50:04 Re: New SQL counter statistics view (pg_stat_sql)