From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improve handling of parameter differences in physical replication |
Date: | 2020-02-28 15:33:31 |
Message-ID: | 20200228153331.GA31634@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Feb-27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> So this patch relaxes this a bit. Upon receipt of
> XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE, we still check the settings but only issue a
> warning and set a global flag if there is a problem. Then when we
> actually hit the resource issue and the flag was set, we issue another
> warning message with relevant information. Additionally, at that
> point we pause recovery, so a hot standby remains usable.
Hmm, so what is the actual end-user behavior? As I read the code, we
first send the WARNING, then pause recovery until the user resumes
replication; at that point we raise the original error. Presumably, at
that point the startup process terminates and is relaunched, and replay
continues normally. Is that it?
I think if the startup process terminates because of the original error,
after it is unpaused, postmaster will get that as a signal to do a
crash-recovery cycle, closing all existing connections. Is that right?
If so, it would be worth improving that (possibly by adding a
sigsetjmp() block) to avoid the disruption.
Thanks,
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-02-28 15:35:56 | Re: Trying to pull up EXPR SubLinks |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-02-28 15:30:28 | Re: proposal: schema variables |