Re: backend type in log_line_prefix?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: backend type in log_line_prefix?
Date: 2020-02-20 03:41:35
Message-ID: 20200220034135.rye6idkq6t5mxoxn@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2020-02-13 09:56:38 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Attached is a demo patch that adds a placeholder %b for log_line_prefix (not
> in the default setting) that contains the backend type, the same that you
> see in pg_stat_activity and in the ps status. I would have found this
> occasionally useful when analyzing logs, especially if you have a lot of
> background workers active. Thoughts?

I wished for this several times.

> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ AuxiliaryProcessMain(int argc, char *argv[])
> statmsg = "??? process";
> break;
> }
> - init_ps_display(statmsg, "", "", "");
> + init_ps_display((backend_type_str = statmsg), "", "", "");
> }

But I'm decidedly not a fan of this.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-02-20 03:55:12 Experimenting with transactional memory for SERIALIZABLE
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-02-20 03:36:40 Re: Print physical file path when checksum check fails