Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
Cc: nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, keisuke kuroda <keisuke(dot)kuroda(dot)3862(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
Date: 2020-02-12 17:59:13
Message-ID: 20200212175913.52i6ykv4eijsodjk@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-02-12 17:49:14 +0000, Emre Hasegeli wrote:
> > Nor do I see how it's going to be ok to just rename the function in a
> > stable branch.
>
> I'll post another version to keep them around.

I'd just rename the macro to the name of the inline function. No need to
have a verbose change in all callsites just to update the name imo.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-02-12 18:15:22 Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11
Previous Message Emre Hasegeli 2020-02-12 17:49:14 Re: In PG12, query with float calculations is slower than PG11