From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com |
Cc: | kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)gmail(dot)com, masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tid scan increments value of pg_stat_all_tables.seq_scan. (but not seq_tup_read) |
Date: | 2020-02-07 08:34:29 |
Message-ID: | 20200207.173429.1490024330474398176.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At Fri, 7 Feb 2020 17:01:59 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote in
>
>
> On 2020/02/07 15:07, Kasahara Tatsuhito wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 1:27 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> It seems that nkeys and key are useless. Since every table_beginscan_*
> >> functions have distinct parameter sets, don't we remove them from
> >> table_beginscan_tid?
> > Yeah, actually, when calling table_beginscan_tid(), nkeys is set to 0
> > and * key is set to NULL,
> > so these are not used at the moment.
> > I removed unnecessary arguments from table_beginscan_tid().
> > Attache the v5 patch.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch! The patch looks good to me.
> So barring any objection, I will push it and back-patch to v12 *soon*
> so that the upcoming minor version can contain it.
>
> BTW, commit 147e3722f7 causing the issue changed currtid_byreloid()
> and currtid_byrelname() so that they also call table_beginscan().
> I'm not sure what those functions are, but probably we should fix them
> so that table_beginscan_tid() is called instead. Thought?
At least they don't seem to need table_beginscan(), to me.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2020-02-07 08:42:36 | Re: ALTER tbl rewrite loses CLUSTER ON index |
Previous Message | Kasahara Tatsuhito | 2020-02-07 08:28:43 | Re: Tid scan increments value of pg_stat_all_tables.seq_scan. (but not seq_tup_read) |