Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers

At Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:45:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote in
> On 2020-Jan-30, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>
> > Agreed about backbranches. I'd like to preserve the word "transaction"
> > as it is more familiar to users. How about something like the follows?
> >
> > "transactions are completed up to log time %s"
>
> That's a good point. I used the phrase "transaction activity", which
> seems sufficiently explicit to me.
>
> So, the attached is the one for master; in back branches I would use the
> same (plus minor conflict fixes), except that I would drop the message
> wording changes.
>
> Thanks for the reviews so far,

My pleasure.

regads.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center