Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: standby apply lag on inactive servers
Date: 2020-01-27 21:06:27
Message-ID: 20200127210627.GA17687@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Actually looking again, getRecordTimestamp is looking pretty strange.
It looks much more natural by using nested switch/case blocks, as with
this diff. I think the compiler does a better job this way too.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-27 21:18:33 Re: JIT performance bug/regression & JIT EXPLAIN
Previous Message Mahendra Singh Thalor 2020-01-27 20:43:14 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum