Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve search for missing parent downlinks in amcheck
Date: 2020-01-16 22:05:30
Message-ID: 20200116220530.4zpyhphxgqdqxf6p@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 03:03:01PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:15:19AM +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>> The revised patch seems to fix all of above.
>
>The latest patch is failing to apply. Please provide a rebase.

This still does not apply (per cputube). Can you provide a fixed patch?

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-16 23:15:40 Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2020-01-16 22:00:12 Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support