From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Luis Carril <luis(dot)carril(at)swarm64(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add FOREIGN to ALTER TABLE in pg_dump |
Date: | 2020-01-14 22:23:26 |
Message-ID: | 20200114222326.GA20471@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jan-14, vignesh C wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:52 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:17 PM Luis Carril <luis(dot)carril(at)swarm64(dot)com> wrote:
> > >>> Your patch is failing the pg_dump TAP tests. Please use
> > >>> configure --enable-tap-tests, fix the problems, then resubmit.
> >
> > >> Fixed, I've attached a new version.
> >
> > > Will it be possible to add a test case for this, can we validate by
> > > adding one test?
> >
> > Isn't the change in the TAP test output sufficient?
>
> I could not see any expected file output changes in the patch. Should
> we modify the existing test to validate this.
Yeah, I think there should be at least one regexp in t/002_pg_dump.pl to
verify ALTER FOREIGN TABLE is being produced.
I wonder if Tom is thinking about Luis' other pg_dump patch for foreign
tables, which includes some changes to src/test/modules/test_pg_dump.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-01-14 22:27:01 | Re: Rearranging ALTER TABLE to avoid multi-operations bugs |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-01-14 22:18:14 | pgindent && weirdness |