Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Guo <riguo(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()?
Date: 2020-01-11 12:27:06
Message-ID: 20200111122706.kaj6zmcvjcakrwzz@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 05:07:11PM +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The proposition I posted at 10th-Oct proposed to have a separate list to retain
>lesser paths not to expand the path_list length, but here are no comments by
>others at that time.
>Indeed, the latest patch has not been updated yet.
>Please wait for a few days. I'll refresh the patch again.
>

OK, thanks for the update. I've marked the patch as "waiting on author".

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-01-11 13:31:59 Re: Efficient output for integer types
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2020-01-11 12:25:01 Re: Amcheck: do rightlink verification with lock coupling