From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <tmunro(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Add reusable routine for making arrays unique. |
Date: | 2020-01-06 01:31:41 |
Message-ID: | 20200106013141.GA15896@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 2020-Jan-04, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:03 PM Thomas Munro <tmunro(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> > Add reusable routine for making arrays unique.
>
> I noticed that some of the copyright notices added by this commit look
> like this:
>
> + * Portions Copyright (c) 2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
>
> Shouldn't this simply read "Copyright (c) 2019 ..."? We're not sharing
> the Copyright with Regents of the University of California, or anyone
> else, so there it is not just a portion.
Looking at the stats, it's clear that it took a lot of code from other
files, so it seems disingenuous to claim that it doesn't have even a
single line that isn't copyrighted by UCB regents. I've seen this
argument used even for files that are completely new: they are likely
affected some API design aspect of existing code copyright of UCB
regents, so it too would have Portions (c) them.
> It would be nice to have some general guidance on copyright notices in
> new files. I usually just copy what I see in nearby files, but that
> doesn't seem particularly principled.
I think the easiest is to state that all files, even new files are
Portions (c) each of these entities, period. Trying to distinguish code
that's not even a single line derived from UCB Regents seems really
labor-intensive.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-01-06 01:43:26 | pgsql: Remove redundant incomplete split assertion. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-01-05 18:30:42 | Re: pgsql: Add basic TAP tests for psql's tab-completion logic. |