Re: Order by and timestamp

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Björn Lundin <b(dot)f(dot)lundin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order by and timestamp
Date: 2020-03-16 23:20:04
Message-ID: 20195383-f8ae-9b48-9a8e-dd19f6efb8b4@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 3/16/20 2:50 PM, Björn Lundin wrote:

>
> But not for that data sep/oct 2016

Had a thought, what if on the ibm2 machine you do:

UPDATE amarkets SET startts = '2016-09-30 13:00:00' WHERE
marketid = 1.127278857;

And then rerun:

select * from amarkets order by startts;

>
>
>> Yes really, otherwise you would not be seeing a difference. Sorry, pet
>> peeve of mine, when people say these two things are not doing the same
>> thing but then say they are the same thing.
>>
>>> I mean, the pg_dump does copy-commands.
>>
>> It also does a certain amount of setup at the beginning of the file.
>
> I stand corrected
>
> --
> Björn Lundin
> b(dot)f(dot)lundin(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:b(dot)f(dot)lundin(at)gmail(dot)com>
>
>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samuel Smith 2020-03-17 05:56:48 Re: Invalid byte sequence errors on DB restore
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2020-03-16 22:21:34 Re: Order by and timestamp