Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Elvis Pranskevichus <elprans(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Date: 2019-12-26 20:15:13
Message-ID: 20191226201513.GA15320@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Dec-26, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> The name of the label "consume_checked_write_connection" is not very
> descriptive. I propose "conn_succeeded" instead.

(I realized later that I should have removed this paragraph -- other
goto labels are added in 0002 that would make such renaming more
confusing than helpful. My later comment about the if/else/then maze is
more general.)

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2019-12-26 20:17:45 Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-12-26 20:07:23 Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority