Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
Date: 2019-12-25 01:26:40
Message-ID: 20191225012640.GC3448@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 02:22:22PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> The change does not attempt to keep included files in ab order. Should it do
> that, or is it fixed later by some reindentation phase?

Yeah, it should. Committed after fixing all that stuff.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-12-25 01:39:32 Re: mdclose() does not cope w/ FileClose() failure
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-12-25 00:33:28 Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys