Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
Date: 2019-12-23 20:08:10
Message-ID: 20191223200809.GI32763@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 02:34:34PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was working on some stuff for table AMs, and I got to wonder it we
> had better rename amapi.h to indexam.h and amapi.c to indexam.c, so as
> things are more consistent with table AM. It is a bit annoying to
> name the files dedicated to index AMs with what looks like now a too
> generic name. That would require switching a couple of header files
> for existing module developers, which is always annoying, but the move
> makes sense thinking long-term?

+1 for being more specific about which AM we're talking about.

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashwin Agrawal 2019-12-23 20:28:36 Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-12-23 19:51:56 string literal continuations in C