| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Read Uncommitted |
| Date: | 2019-12-18 19:34:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20191218193433.GW3195@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 1:06 PM Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > Just consider this part of the recovery toolkit.
>
> I agree that it would be useful to have a recovery toolkit for reading
> uncommitted data, but I think a lot more thought needs to be given to
> how such a thing should be designed. If you just add something called
> READ UNCOMMITTED, people are going to expect it to have *way* saner
> semantics than this will. They'll use it routinely, not just as a
> last-ditch mechanism to recover otherwise-lost data. And I'm
> reasonably confident that will not work out well.
+1.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Koković | 2019-12-18 19:57:26 | Re: Restore backup file "with oids" |
| Previous Message | Rahila Syed | 2019-12-18 19:31:52 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |