Re: error context for vacuum to include block number

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Date: 2019-12-16 02:49:56
Message-ID: 20191216024956.GC2344@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:27:12AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I named it so because it calls both lazy_vacuum_index
> ("PROGRESS_VACUUM_PHASE_VACUUM_INDEX") and
> lazy_vacuum_heap("PROGRESS_VACUUM_PHASE_VACUUM_HEAP")
>
> I suppose you don't think the other way around is better?
> lazy_vacuum_index_heap

Dunno. Let's see if others have other thoughts on the matter. FWIW,
I have a long history at naming things in a way others don't like :)
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2019-12-16 03:22:18 Re: PATCH: standby crashed when replay block which truncated in standby but failed to truncate in master node
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-16 02:46:25 Re: What's the best way to get flex and bison on Windows?