| From: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: minscale, rtrim, btrim functions for numeric |
| Date: | 2019-12-09 18:25:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20191209122523.5a4807ca@slate.karlpinc.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 12:15:22 -0600
"Karl O. Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> wrote:
> I've had some thoughts about the regression tests.
> Having written
> it out it seems like a lot of testing for such a simple function.
FYI.
I don't see trim_scale() needing such exhaustive testing because you'll
have already tested a lot with the min_scale() tests.
Regards,
Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ibrar Ahmed | 2019-12-09 18:30:20 | VACUUM memory management |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2019-12-09 18:24:53 | Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test |