Re: archiving question

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Zwettler Markus (OIZ)" <Markus(dot)Zwettler(at)zuerich(dot)ch>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: archiving question
Date: 2019-12-06 01:42:35
Message-ID: 20191206014235.GG121835@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 03:04:55PM +0000, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> What do you mean hear?
>
> Afaik, Postgres runs the archive_command per log, means log by log by log.
>
> How should we parallelize this?

You can, in theory, skip the archiving for a couple of segments and
then do the operation at once without the need to patch Postgres.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron 2019-12-06 02:50:11 Re: Date created for tables
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-06 01:40:36 Re: Date created for tables