From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Pereira <kripper(at)imatronix(dot)cl> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup + incremental base backups |
Date: | 2019-12-04 03:09:07 |
Message-ID: | 20191204030907.GB6962@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greetings,
* Christopher Pereira (kripper(at)imatronix(dot)cl) wrote:
> Our stream replication slave server got out of sync so we need to base
> backup again.
If you do WAL archiving instead of depending on the WAL to exist on the
primary then a replica can catch up using WAL. Having a WAL archive
also means you can do point-in-time-recovery for any point.
> In case of big databases, can we do incremental backups with pg_basebackup?
pg_basebackup doesn't support incremental backups, though there's been
discussion of adding some kind of support for it, check -hackers if
you're curious.
> Is there any alternative?
There's a few different alternatives for PG backup software, some of
which support incremental backups and restores. I'm personally involved
with pgbackrest- https://pgbackrest.org though there's other options out
there also (wal-g, barman, and more).
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-12-04 04:48:43 | Re: upgrade and migrate |
Previous Message | Julie Nishimura | 2019-12-03 22:32:22 | upgrade and migrate |