From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | cilizili(at)protonmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16144: Segmentation fault on dict_int extension |
Date: | 2019-12-02 16:19:20 |
Message-ID: | 20191202161920.d3k7b6dpqcgl5mst@development |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 12:41:21PM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
>The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
>Bug reference: 16144
>Logged by: cili
>Email address: cilizili(at)protonmail(dot)com
>PostgreSQL version: 12.1
>Operating system: CentOS 7.4
>Description:
>
>The dict_int extension is an example of an add-on dictionary template for
>full-text search. The 'intdict' is a built-in dictionary. If we set MAXLEN
>parameter with negative value for the dictionary, ts_lexize function causes
>a segmentation fault. The negative limit for MAXLEN which causes
>segmentation fault is environment dependent.
>
># initdb
># pg_ctl -D /var/lib/pgsql/data -l logfile start
># psql
>
>postgres=# CREATE EXTENSION dict_int;
>CREATE EXTENSION
>postgres=# ALTER TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY intdict (MAXLEN = -214783648);
>ALTER TEXT SEARCH DICTIONARY
>postgres=# select ts_lexize('intdict', '12345678');
>server closed the connection unexpectedly
> This probably means the server terminated abnormally
> before or while processing the request.
>The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed.
>!>
>!>\q
>
Yeah, this seems to be a failure in evaluating maxlen parameter. It's
set to 6 by default, but we simply trust whatever value the user gives
us, and then we do this
txt[d->maxlen] = '\0';
which fails for obvious reasons.
Will fix by rejecting maxlen values less than 1. The docs don't say
which value should the the minimum, but 0 seems useless.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grigory Smolkin | 2019-12-02 16:54:50 | Re: logical replication: could not create file "state.tmp": File exists |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-12-02 16:12:22 | Re: logical replication: could not create file "state.tmp": File exists |