Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)heterodb(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN
Date: 2019-12-01 03:24:11
Message-ID: 20191201032411.GD2355@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 05:33:01PM +0900, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> On the other hands, it eventually consumes almost equivalent amount
> of memory to load the inner relations, if no leafs are pruned, and if we
> could extend the Hash-node to share the hash-table with sibling
> join-nodess.

The patch crashes when running the regression tests, per the report of
the automatic patch tester. Could you look at that? I have moved the
patch to nexf CF, waiting on author.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 03:26:03 Re: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 03:20:11 Re: Control your disk usage in PG: Introduction to Disk Quota Extension