Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2019-12-01 02:28:34
Message-ID: 20191201022834.GS2355@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 01:18:11PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> I have rebased the patch on the latest head and also fix the issue of
> "concurrent abort handling of the (sub)transaction." and attached as
> (v1-0013-Extend-handling-of-concurrent-aborts-for-streamin) along with
> the complete patch set. I have added the version number so that we
> can track the changes.

The patch has rotten a bit and does not apply anymore. Could you
please send a rebased version? I have moved it to next CF, waiting on
author.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 02:30:48 Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-12-01 02:25:48 Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2