| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: progress report for ANALYZE |
| Date: | 2019-11-26 12:22:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20191126122251.GA2848@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Nov-26, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
> > I wonder whether we need the total number of ext stats on
> > pg_stat_progress_analyze or not. As you might know, there is the same
> > counter on pg_stat_progress_vacuum and pg_stat_progress_cluster.
> > For example, index_vacuum_count and index_rebuild_count.
>
> Would it be better to add the total number column to these views? :)
Yeah, I think it would be good to add that.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2019-11-26 12:34:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2019-11-26 12:13:16 | [PATCH] Remove twice assignment with var pageop (nbtree.c). |