Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Date: 2019-11-25 08:10:55
Message-ID: 20191125081055.GN99720@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 05:26:37PM -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Attached is v24. This revision doesn't fix the problem with
> xl_btree_insert record bloat, but it does fix the bitrot against the
> master branch that was caused by commit 50d22de9. (This patch has had
> a surprisingly large number of conflicts against the master branch
> recently.)

Please note that I have moved this patch to next CF per this last
update. Anastasia, the ball is waiting on your side of the field, as
the CF entry is marked as waiting on author for some time now.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-25 08:13:07 Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-25 08:08:09 Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible