| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TAP tests aren't using the magic words for Windows file access |
| Date: | 2019-11-22 08:00:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20191122080041.GH42684@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 08:09:38PM +0100, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> I think Perl's open() is a bad candidate for an overload, so I will update
> the previous patch that only touches slurp_file().
FWIW, I don't like much the approach of patching only slurp_file().
What gives us the guarantee that we won't have this discussion again
in a couple of months or years once a new caller of open() is added
for some new TAP tests, and that it has the same problems with
multi-process concurrency?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-11-22 08:05:19 | Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-22 07:57:24 | Re: Rework manipulation and structure of attribute mappings |