From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: format of pg_upgrade loadable_libraries warning |
Date: | 2019-11-14 23:00:37 |
Message-ID: | 20191114230037.GF6160@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:49:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 04:06:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> BTW, how is one supposed to "manually upgrade databases that use
> >> contrib/isb"? This part is not very clear.
>
> > I thought you would dump out databases that use isn, drop those
> > databases, use pg_upgrade for the remaining databases, then load the
> > dumped database. Attached is a patch that improves the wording.
>
> That's better wording, but do we need similar for any of the other
> not-supported checks?
I don't think so. The other checks are checking for the _use_ of
certain things in user objects, and the user objects can be dropped,
while this check checks for the existence of _functions_ from an
extension that must be uninstalled. I assume the extension can be
uninstalled in the database, but I assume something uses it and that
telling people to find all the users of the extension then dropping it
is too complex to describe.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-11-14 23:06:46 | Re: Missing dependency tracking for TableFunc nodes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-11-14 22:49:12 | Re: format of pg_upgrade loadable_libraries warning |