Re: Adding a test for speculative insert abort case

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Taylor Vesely <tvesely(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Subject: Re: Adding a test for speculative insert abort case
Date: 2019-11-11 08:41:10
Message-ID: 20191111084110.GE1418@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:59:00PM -0700, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> So, what should we do about this? Do you agree that the "controller_show"
> step would be a problem?

Andres, it seems to me that this is waiting some input from you.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2019-11-11 08:56:49 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-11 08:37:30 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?