Re: Monitoring disk space from within the server

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Monitoring disk space from within the server
Date: 2019-11-08 14:50:25
Message-ID: 20191108145025.d7pfcip6plufxiah@development
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 02:24:19PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
>Monitoring the available disk space is the topmost thing on the
>priority for PostgreSQL operation, yet this metric is not available
>from the SQL level.
>

While I agree monitoring disk space is important, I think pretty much
every deployment already does that using some other monitoring tool
(which also monitors million other things).

Also, I wonder how universal / reliable this actually is, considering
the range of filesystems and related stuff (thin provisioning, quotas,
...) people use in production. I do recall a number of cases when "df"
was showing a plenty of free space, but one of the internal resources
for that particular filesystem was exhausted. I doubt it's desirable to
add all this knowledge into PostgreSQL.

It's not clear to me what issue this is actually meant to solve - it
provides data, which is nice, but it still needs to be fed to some
motinoring and alerting system. And every monitoring system has a good
plugin to collect this type of data, so why not to use that?

Surely, we can't rely on this for any internal logic - so why not to
provide this as an extension?

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirk, Steve 2019-11-08 15:00:00 Frequent HLL bitstream_unpack crashes
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2019-11-08 14:38:53 Re: pg_upgrade and subscriptions