Re: wal_sender_timeout / wal_receiver_timeout - seconds or milliseconds?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: d(dot)aumueller(at)proventa(dot)de, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wal_sender_timeout / wal_receiver_timeout - seconds or milliseconds?
Date: 2019-11-08 00:05:19
Message-ID: 20191108000519.GU1768@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:36:17PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Right. I am just asking if we need to do this for _every_ case where
> the default value doesn't match the default _units_, or if we need to
> have some kind of central notification.

Doing it for all places where it matters makes sense to me, aka in the
description of the docs for each parameter, and perhaps add a note in
postgresql.conf.sample. I am still not sure what you mean with a
central notification though, like a separate section in the docs?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2019-11-08 06:43:43 tables in the DB is not available after pg_restore.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-11-07 23:05:16 Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better off replaced