Re: update ALTER TABLE with ATTACH PARTITION lock mode (docs)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: update ALTER TABLE with ATTACH PARTITION lock mode (docs)
Date: 2019-11-01 14:01:22
Message-ID: 20191101140122.GI2530@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 08:59:48AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> I guess you mean because it's not a child until after the ALTER. Yes, that
> makes sense.

Yes, perhaps you have another idea than mine on how to shape this
sentence?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-01 14:01:43 Re: Problem with synchronous replication
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-11-01 13:59:48 Re: update ALTER TABLE with ATTACH PARTITION lock mode (docs)