From: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | thunder1(at)126(dot)com |
Cc: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [BUG] standby node can not provide service even it replays all log files |
Date: | 2019-10-23 03:51:19 |
Message-ID: | 20191023.125119.271090295084256939.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello.
At Tue, 22 Oct 2019 20:42:21 +0800 (CST), Thunder <thunder1(at)126(dot)com> wrote in
> Update the patch.
>
> 1. The STANDBY_SNAPSHOT_PENDING state is set when we replay the first XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS and the sub transaction ids are overflow.
> 2. When we log XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS in master node, can we assume that all xact IDS < oldestRunningXid are considered finished?
Unfortunately we can't. Standby needs to know that the *standby's*
oldest active xid exceeds the pendig xmin, not master's. And it is
already processed in ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo. We cannot assume that
the oldest xids are not same on the both side in a replication pair.
> 3. If we can assume this, when we replay XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS and change standbyState to STANDBY_SNAPSHOT_PENDING, can we record oldestRunningXid to a shared variable, like procArray->oldest_running_xid?
> 4. In standby node when call GetSnapshotData if procArray->oldest_running_xid is valid, can we set xmin to be procArray->oldest_running_xid?
>
> Appreciate any suggestion to this issue.
At 2019-10-22 01:27:58, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:13 AM Thunder <thunder1(at)126(dot)com> wrote:
..
> >I think that the issue you've encountered is design behavior. In
> >other words, it's intended to work that way.
> >
> >The comments for the code you propose to change say that we can allow
> >connections once we've got a valid snapshot. So presumably the effect
> >of your change would be to allow connections even though we don't have
> >a valid snapshot.
> >
> >That seems bad.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-10-23 03:51:33 | Re: [PATCH] Do not use StdRdOptions in Access Methods |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-10-23 03:28:33 | Re: Remove obsolete options for createuser |