Re: Remove obsolete information schema tables

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remove obsolete information schema tables
Date: 2019-10-21 05:34:01
Message-ID: 20191021053401.GA1869@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:01:09AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-10-17 09:44, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I have a question here. Per the notes in information_schema.sql,
> > SQL_SIZING_PROFILES has been removed in SQL:2011,
>
> OK, we can remove that one as well. New patch attached.

Looks fine.

>> attributes.isnullable and DOMAIN_UDT_USAGE in SQL:2003~. Would it
>> make sense to cleanup those ones?
>
> OK, I'll look into those, but it seems like a separate undertaking. We
> don't always remove things just because they were dropped by the SQL
> standard.

But that's the same kind of cleanup you do here. What's the
difference with DOMAIN_UDT_USAGE, which is mentioned as removed from
SQL:2003?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2019-10-21 05:38:06 Re: dropdb --force
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2019-10-21 05:18:33 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions