From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc after pg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12 |
Date: | 2019-10-13 20:38:48 |
Message-ID: | 20191013203848.2eksimmpux3546wr@development |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 02:26:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> here is an updated patch, with the recursive CTE. I've done a fair
>> amount of testing on it on older versions (up to 9.4), and it seems to
>> work just fine.
>
>Might be a good idea to exclude attisdropped columns in the part of the
>recursive query that's looking for sql_identifier columns of composite
>types. I'm not sure if composites can have dropped columns today,
>but even if they can't it seems like a wise bit of future-proofing.
>(We'll no doubt have occasion to use this logic again...)
>
Hmm? How could that be safe? Let's say we have a composite type with a
sql_identifier column, it's used in a table with data, and we drop the
column. We need the pg_type information to parse the existing, so how
could we skip attisdropped columns?
>Looks good other than that nit.
>
>> BTW the query (including the RELKIND_COMPSITE_TYPE) was essentially just
>> a lightly-massaged copy of old_9_6_check_for_unknown_data_type_usage, so
>> that seems wrong too.
>
>Yeah, we should back-port this logic into that check too, IMO.
>
You mean the recursive CTE, removal of RELKIND_COMPOSITE_TYPE or the
proposed change w.r.t. dropped columns?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2019-10-14 02:24:10 | BUG #16054: Slowest individual queries |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-10-13 19:23:40 | Re: ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: "0A000" |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2019-10-13 20:52:05 | Add A Glossary |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2019-10-13 20:02:17 | Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join |