Re: dropping column prevented due to inherited index

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: dropping column prevented due to inherited index
Date: 2019-10-13 08:56:02
Message-ID: 20191013085602.GA3353@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:08:41PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:39:47PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Typo "resursing". This comment seems a bit too long to me. Maybe
>> "Recursion having ended, drop everything that was collected." suffices.
>> (Fits in one line.)
>
> Sounds fine to me, thanks.

I have been able to look at this issue once again, and applied the fix
down to v12. Thanks, all!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-10-13 09:06:43 Re: v12.0: segfault in reindex CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message David Fetter 2019-10-13 07:55:17 Re: adding partitioned tables to publications