Re: Most-common value docs in PG 12

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Most-common value docs in PG 12
Date: 2019-09-26 20:20:59
Message-ID: 20190926202059.GD16366@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 05:17:55PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Sep-26, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 06:15:22PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > On 2019-Aug-30, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > OK, how is this patch? I didn't mention psql since I think everyone
> > > > expects psql to show all information about tables and indexes.
> > >
> > > Why would you change perform.sgml? It seems unnecessary; the commands
> > > shown work fine.
> >
> > I realize they work fine, but the ordering in the examples not matching
> > the defined order suggests that ordering matters, but it does not.
>
> Well, I mean exactly the other way around: the fact that the orders
> don't match illustrates that the order is not important. And that is
> reinforced by the explanation indicating explicitly that it does not
> matter:

Uh, people normally list things in defined order, so you would usually
not list them in non-defined order unless there is a purpose. Doing
that just to illustrate the order doesn't matter seems odd.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-09-26 21:03:54 Re: Most-common value docs in PG 12
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-26 20:17:55 Re: Most-common value docs in PG 12