Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli(dot)khodorkovskiy(at)crunchydata(dot)com>
Cc: Mike Palmiotto <mike(dot)palmiotto(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
Date: 2019-09-26 13:49:11
Message-ID: 20190926134911.GA10616@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

0002 seems way too large (and it doesn't currently apply). Is there
something we can do to make it more manageable?

I think it would be better to put your 0001 in second place rather than
first, since your other patch doesn't use it AFAICS and it adds
functionality that has not yet received approval [or even been
discussed], while the other is necessary refactoring.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Guo 2019-09-26 14:05:16 Re: Two pg_rewind patches (auto generate recovery conf and ensure clean shutdown)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-09-26 13:47:31 Re: dropdb --force