Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?

From: stan <stanb(at)panix(dot)com>
To: Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?
Date: 2019-09-20 11:02:58
Message-ID: 20190920110258.GA12885@panix.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 03:54:40PM -0600, Michael Lewis wrote:
> You can also look at citext type to avoid the casting.
>
> customer_key integer DEFAULT
> nextval('customer_key_serial') PRIMARY KEY ,
> cust_no smallint NOT NULL UNIQUE ,
> name varchar UNIQUE ,
>
I am confysed. I am running version 11 which is current I beleive, but when
I try to use this type, I get:

ERROR: type "citext" does not exist
LINE 8: unit citext UNIQUE NOT NULL ,

Do I somehow need to enable this type?
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message stan 2019-09-20 11:08:46 Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?
Previous Message Morris de Oryx 2019-09-20 10:52:00 Re: FW: Re: FW: Re: Shouldn;t this trigger be called?