From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Alexey Kondratov <a(dot)kondratov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on the fly |
Date: | 2019-09-19 04:43:00 |
Message-ID: | 20190919044300.GB21144@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 03:46:20PM +0300, Alexey Kondratov wrote:
> Currently in Postgres SET TABLESPACE always comes with [ NOWAIT ] option, so
> I hope it worth adding this option here for convenience. Added in the new
> version.
It seems to me that it would be good to keep the patch as simple as
possible for its first version, and split it into two if you would
like to add this new option instead of bundling both together. This
makes the review of one and the other more simple. Anyway, regarding
the grammar, is SET TABLESPACE really our best choice here? What
about:
- TABLESPACE = foo, in parenthesis only?
- Only using TABLESPACE, without SET at the end of the query?
SET is used in ALTER TABLE per the set of subqueries available there,
but that's not the case of REINDEX.
+-- check that all relations moved to new tablespace
+SELECT relname FROM pg_class
+WHERE reltablespace=(SELECT oid FROM pg_tablespace WHERE
spcname='regress_tblspace')
+AND relname IN ('regress_tblspace_test_tbl_idx');
+ relname
+-------------------------------
+ regress_tblspace_test_tbl_idx
+(1 row)
Just to check one relation you could use \d with the relation (index
or table) name.
- if (RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP(iRel))
- ereport(ERROR,
- (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
- errmsg("cannot reindex temporary tables of other
- sessions")))
I would keep the order of this operation in order with
CheckTableNotInUse().
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Smith, Peter | 2019-09-19 04:46:27 | RE: Proposal: Add more compile-time asserts to expose inconsistencies. |
Previous Message | Mitar | 2019-09-19 04:32:30 | Re: Feature request: binary NOTIFY |