From: | Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Add enum releation option type |
Date: | 2019-09-05 15:42:27 |
Message-ID: | 20190905154227.GA5287@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
After looking closer once again, I don't like this patch.
I think the FOOBAR_ENUM_DEF defines serve no purpose, other than
source-code placement next to the enum value definitions. I think for
example check_option, living in reloptions.c, should look like this:
{
{
"check_option",
"View has WITH CHECK OPTION defined (local or cascaded).",
RELOPT_KIND_VIEW,
AccessExclusiveLock
},
{
{ "local", VIEW_OPTION_CHECK_OPTION_LOCAL },
{ "cascaded", VIEW_OPTION_CHECK_OPTION_CASCADED },
{ NULL }
},
"Valid values are \"local\" and \"cascaded\"."
},
Note the relopt_enum is pretty much the same you have, except we also
have a const char *valid_values_errdetail; and the ugly #define no
longer exists but instead we put it in enumRelOpts.
rel.h ends up like this:
/*
* Values for ViewOptions->check_option.
*/
typedef enum
{
VIEWOPTIONS_CHECK_OPTION_NOTSET,
VIEWOPTIONS_CHECK_OPTION_LOCAL,
VIEWOPTIONS_CHECK_OPTION_CASCADED
} ViewOpts_CheckOptionValues;
/*
* ViewOptions
* Contents of rd_options for views
*/
typedef struct ViewOptions
{
int32 vl_len_; /* varlena header (do not touch directly!) */
bool security_barrier;
ViewOpts_CheckOptionValues check_option;
} ViewOptions;
I'm marking this Waiting on Author.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-05 15:53:31 | Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant | 2019-09-05 15:25:02 | Re: [PATCH] Add support for ON UPDATE/DELETE actions on ALTER CONSTRAINT |