| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Paul Guo <pguo(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) |
| Date: | 2019-09-03 15:58:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20190903155855.GA15118@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-Aug-22, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> 22.08.2019 16:13, Paul Guo wrote:
> > Thanks. I updated the patch to v5. It passes install-check testing and
> > recovery testing.
> Hi,
> Thank you for working on this fix.
> The overall design of the latest version looks good to me.
> But during the review, I found a bug in the current implementation.
> New behavior must apply to crash-recovery only, now it applies to
> archiveRecovery too.
Hello
Paul, Kyotaro, are you working on updating this bugfix? FWIW the latest
patch submitted by Paul is still current and CFbot says it passes its
own test, but from Anastasia's email it still needs a bit of work.
Also: it would be good to have this new bogus scenario described by
Anastasia covered by a new TAP test. Anastasia, can we enlist you to
write that? Maybe Kyotaro?
Thanks
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-03 16:04:20 | Re: SIGQUIT on archiver child processes maybe not such a hot idea? |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2019-09-03 15:49:13 | Re: pg11.5: ExecHashJoinNewBatch: glibc detected...double free or corruption (!prev) |