Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2019-09-02 22:06:50
Message-ID: 20190902220650.GA1868@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

In the interest of moving things forward, how far are we from making
0001 committable? If I understand correctly, the rest of this patchset
depends on https://commitfest.postgresql.org/24/944/ which seems to be
moving at a glacial pace (or, actually, slower, because glaciers do
move, which cannot be said of that other patch.)

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-02 22:12:44 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-09-02 21:21:23 Re: Converting NOT IN to anti-joins during planning