From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Release notes on "reserved OIDs" |
Date: | 2019-08-31 02:44:53 |
Message-ID: | 20190831024453.GB25522@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:35:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Hmm. I wonder if this item really belongs in the release notes at all.
> > My view is that this was interim policy, not necessarily a permanent
> > thing; and it's oriented strictly towards PG developers rather than end
> > users or even fork-developers.
>
> I think it's the sort of thing that we sometimes cover in the
> "source code" changes of the release notes. But yeah, 09568ec3d's
> idea was pretty much fully superseded by a6417078c, so if we're
> going to document anything it should be the latter not the former.
OK, sure. I was just basing the release notes on this commit text:
Add a note suggesting that oids in forks should be assigned in the
9000-9999 range.
I was looking to see information that was relevant for the release
notes. Please update as desired.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2019-09-02 14:47:45 | Consolidation of first figures |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-08-30 23:28:04 | Re: Most-common value docs in PG 12 |