Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions
Date: 2019-08-26 07:28:59
Message-ID: 20190826072859.GH7005@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Fabien,

On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 04:48:35PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Ok, so there is an agreement on reworking the unsigned function. I missed
> this bit.
>
> So I'll set out to write and use "pg_strtou?int64", i.e. 2 functions, and
> then possibly generalize to lower sizes, 32, 16, depending on what is
> actually needed.

I am interested in this patch, and the next commit fest is close by.
Are you working on an updated version? If not, do you mind if I work
on it and post a new version by the beginning of next week based on
all the feedback gathered?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-08-26 07:51:57 Re: Can't we give better table bloat stats easily?
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-08-26 06:56:21 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks