Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Date: 2019-08-23 11:44:04
Message-ID: 20190823114404.GA28868@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 03:35:01PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Good idea. I've updated the doc update patch.

Thanks. I have removed the output part as I am not sure that it is
that helpful for the reader, and applied it down to v10 where the
sections for function types have been introduced (see b5e3942). It
felt also more natural to move the description of the output after
giving the query.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-08-23 11:45:22 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-08-23 11:42:27 Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large?